Compare / Essentia vs Eternal
Essentia vs Eternal
Eternal scores higher on the Waterphile Score (8.5 vs 7.3), so its published values sit closer to the ideal ranges. Eternal carries more dissolved minerals (TDS 100 vs 61.33 mg/L, as published), and Essentia is the lighter water. Eternal has more magnesium (11 vs 1.42 mg/L), and both are under 20 mg/L sodium, the EU low-sodium level.
| Per litre | Essentia | Eternal |
|---|---|---|
| Waterphile Score | 7.3 9/9 | 8.5 8/9 |
| pH | 9.92 | 8 |
| TDS | 61.33 mg/LTDS | 100 mg/LTDS |
| Calcium | Not detected | 19 mg/L |
| Magnesium | 1.42 mg/L | 11 mg/L |
| Sodium | 15 mg/L | 0.6 mg/L |
| Potassium | 7.3 mg/L | 1.5 mg/L |
| Bicarbonate | 33.55 mg/L | Not published |
| Sulfate | 3.17 mg/L | 6.1 mg/L |
| Chloride | Not detected | Not detected |
| Nitrate as N | 0.01 mg/L | 0.15 mg/L |
Sources (2)
- Essentia: Essentia Water Analysis Report 2025 (updated 28 Apr 2026, essentiawater.com) · checked 2026-10-25
- Eternal (Smoky Mountain, TN): Eternal 2026 Bottled Water Quality Report, Newport Springs Bottling (Proffit Spring Source) (eternalwater.com) · checked 2026-10-25
More comparisons
Values as published by each brand, per litre. Not medical advice.