Compare / Deer Park vs Ice Mountain
Deer Park vs Ice Mountain
USASpring water · StillIce Mountain scores higher on the Waterphile Score (7.6 vs 7.2), so its published values sit closer to the ideal ranges. Deer Park gives 0 of these 11 values as single numbers and Ice Mountain gives 0; the rest are ranges, “not detected” or not published, so we don’t compare them.
| Per litre | Deer Park | Ice Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Waterphile Score | 7.2 8/9 | 7.6 8/9 |
| pH | 4.8–8.3 | 6–8.4 |
| TDS | ND–240 mg/LTDS | 53–330 mg/LTDS |
| Calcium | ND–68 mg/L | 6.4–84 mg/L |
| Magnesium | 0.19–9.8 mg/L | 1.3–26 mg/L |
| Sodium | 0.86–8.8 mg/L | 2.2–13 mg/L |
| Potassium | ND–1.1 mg/L | 0.38–1.9 mg/L |
| Sulfate | ND–86 mg/L | 3.4–34 mg/L |
| Chloride | 1.2–17 mg/L | 2.6–16 mg/L |
| Nitrate as N | ND–2.1 mg/L | ND–3.7 mg/L |
Sources (2)
- Deer Park: Deer Park 2025 Water Analysis Report (linked from deerparkwater.com) · checked 2026-10-25
- Ice Mountain: Ice Mountain 2025 Water Analysis Report (linked from icemountainwater.com) · checked 2026-10-25
More comparisons
Values as published by each brand, per litre. Not medical advice.